#810A Stonebridge covenant modification
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 7, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Attorney for the golf course operator argued the 1999 covenants don't bar filing an application while the course is open, citing New York law that restrictive covenants are strictly construed, and warned closing would cost 40-50 jobs.
Planning Board - Oct 7, 2026 · 0:00 →Counsel for the Stonebridge HOA argued the 1999 conditions were a negotiated deal to prevent over-intensification, that the Board lacks power to amend the recorded Declaration without the Town Board and BZA, and asked that the hearing be continued.
Planning Board - Oct 7, 2026 · 0:00 →A Stonebridge homeowner and HOA board member said he and his wife bought their home in reliance on the recorded protections, and asked the Board to deny the petition or defer it until the applicant meets procedural requirements.
Planning Board - Oct 7, 2026 · 0:00 →HOA secretary presented a resident petition opposing the waiver, and raised concerns about stormwater flooding, the Nissequogue River watershed, Blydenburgh Park, trees and ponds, and a breeding pair of bald eagles on the course.
Planning Board - Oct 7, 2026 · 0:00 →A lifelong Hauppauge resident, teacher, and coach who caddied at the course spoke in opposition to the waiver.
Planning Board - Oct 7, 2026 · 0:00 →