Flock surveillance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 14, 2026.
Public comments (11)
Business owner urged the RFP be sent out and called Flock a danger whose data flows to ICE and the FBI.
City Council - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:32:00 →Said she's scared of the cameras tracking walkers as well as cars and wants them gone now.
City Council - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:34:33 →Applauded progress on the Flock resolution, suggested bagging cameras until removal, and called for releasing audit logs.
City Council - Sep 14, 2026 · 1:45:30 →Questioned how the city can be a sanctuary city while operating Flock license plate cameras that could aid ICE; urged removal.
City Council - Jul 13, 2026 · 23:01 →Said Flock is used by ICE and Border Patrol, cited racial profiling risks and a proposed ICE detention camp in the town of Newburgh, and urged contract cancellation.
City Council - Jul 13, 2026 · 24:19 →New Windsor resident strongly opposed Flock cameras and described carrying her passport due to ICE fears.
City Council - Jul 13, 2026 · 43:18 →New Windsor resident respectfully demanded immediate termination of the Flock contract.
City Council - Jul 13, 2026 · 46:38 →Born-and-raised resident concerned about Flock data sharing and abuse.
City Council - Jul 13, 2026 · 57:33 →Criticized council comments defending Flock, explained the difference between ALPRs and speed cameras, and announced a FOIA request for the ALPR data.
City Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 40:39 →A Working Families Party member read from the Flock contract's data-sharing clauses and urged the council to end the 'malicious invasive surveillance system.'
City Council - Jun 8, 2026 · 50:33 →Urged the council to cancel the Flock contract, citing data tracking of abortion patients, protesters, and ICE access, and said the cameras contradict the fair and welcoming city resolution.
City Council - Apr 13, 2026 · 34:09 →