Solar development on farmland
Summary
The state ruled the county's solar laws were fully complied with without ever actually analyzing them. The county is appealing to the Appellate Division for about $310 in filing fees, hoping to protect its scenic byways and cumulative impacts laws and ease the burden on towns like Canajoharie that have spent their own money fighting projects.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 3
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.
Impact analysis
Only ~$310 in filing fees for the county, but towns have spent tens of thousands fighting these projects on their own.
Residents and towns opposed to large-scale solar on prime farmland, plus future development prospects for the county.
Solar developers whose projects face continued legal challenge.
Mentions & discussions (8)
County Legislature — October 27, 2026
A landowner and her tenant told legislators the long-delayed solar project on her Glen-area farms is her only path to financial stability at age 81, while criticizing misinformation and county decisions on solar. She detailed her limited income and rising costs.
County Legislature — August 25, 2026
A local dairy farmer thanked the county for its Farmland Protection Reserve Grant program, which helped her Fonda farm invest in its barn — a win for keeping agriculture viable here.
County Legislature — July 28, 2026
The county's new $250,000 farm grant program funded 11 of 21 applications, mostly for land improvements like tiling and drainage. One applicant cautioned the board against adding money this year before reassessing the first round.
County Legislature — June 23, 2026
A Glen dairy farmer is urging the county to drop its appeal process around solar projects, arguing farming economics — milk oversupply, plant closures, labor costs — leave landowners little choice but to lease for solar. He also criticized outside social media influencers opposing solar.
County Legislature — May 26, 2026
Lawsuits among the Town of Glen, the county, and Farmland interests over solar development have split the farming community. Farmer Ray Dykeman urged legislators to hear landowners' side, saying solar leases may be the only way struggling dairy farms can survive.
County Legislature — May 19, 2026
Legislator Muhlebeck gave a 55-minute New York Post interview about state renewable energy siting overreach, following the county's decisions to appeal the Mill Point and Flat Creek solar rulings. A story is expected this week.
County Legislature — March 17, 2026
The state ruled the county's solar laws were fully complied with without ever actually analyzing them. The county is appealing to the Appellate Division for about $310 in filing fees, hoping to protect its scenic byways and cumulative impacts laws and ease the burden on towns like Canajoharie that have spent their own money fighting projects.
County Legislature — January 27, 2026
The $250,000 farmland protection fund is caught between two purposes: Soil and Water wants it for farm viability grants, while several legislators say it was meant to discourage solar sales. Meanwhile the ag clawback revenue that was supposed to replenish the fund isn't materializing because town assessors aren't doing the paperwork.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Montgomery County, New York
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.